Case study · Briefly iq
Client-confidential meetings, AI-grade output, zero cloud exposure — the IT review passed in one call.
Problem statement
A consultant working under a strict client confidentiality policy was banned from pasting transcripts into cloud AI tools — rightly: one leaked transcript can end an engagement. But manual minutes cost hours, and generic offline tools produced notes, not governance. The choice looked like "fast and risky" or "safe and slow".
Business objective
Confidential content must never touch a third-party server.
Executive summaries and action registers, not raw notes.
A privacy story the client's security team can verify, not just believe.
Our solution
Results & impact
Cloud AI tools banned for client-confidential transcripts.
Manual minutes were the only compliant path.
Generic offline tools produced text without structure.
Generation entirely on the consultant's own hardware via Ollama.
An architecture the client's security team could verify.
Summaries and action registers with nothing leaving the machine.
Real feedback from the first shipped iQ product — Тhe same philosophy, the same quality bar. See all reviews
“I work in advertising, so business cards have always been a regular part of how my team and I meet clients, attend conferences, and build new…”
“I was skeptical of AI summaries since they usually miss what matters, but this one flags risks and the open questions nobody wrote down, and tells…”
“I appreciate that all my summaries stay in a local archive I control, sorted and searchable, without needing another cloud account. The themes let…”
“I’ve known the founder for years, so I know how much thought, effort, and sheer obsession goes into building these products and I’m genuinely…”